-
December 18th, 2003, 02:16 AM
#11
Inactive Member
I think it's a good thing for
a lot of players to actually
manage what they see, en-
visioning what they hear first
and then seeing it, keeping
that balance and stimulus up
on both sides.
[img]cool.gif[/img]
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ December 17, 2003 10:16 PM: Message edited by: peter c ]</font>
-
December 18th, 2003, 05:53 PM
#12
Inactive Member
MTV does distort the music business to the younger generation. But it's not like the biz hasn't always distorted itself to the young. MTV is one of its most powerful tools. Young people have ideals untempered by life experiences. Young people are the demographic that buys popular music (recorded and glamorized by young people.)
The industry always has and always will try to make itself look very attractive to teenagers and pre-teens. The why-work-when-you-can-be-a-star syndrome. A pitiful fraction of these youngsters lured into its honeyed maw will actually become successful. Far be it from me to quash a kid's dreams.
Talent doesn't always equal success. Travis Barker looks the part much more than Ed Shaughnessy. Kids will buy tattoos over muttonchops any day.
-
December 18th, 2003, 06:11 PM
#13
Inactive Member
*Sigh*
Twue, twue...so twue...
Oh yeah, & u r right about the tat's & pierciings over da "muttonchops" thing. LOL
Carmen Elektra: "Hmmm, lessee; the skinny bird chested guy who looks like a girl porn star / shaved head, 'tooed & pierced w the 70's sideburns - or the muttonchops?" [So many choices, so little time]...then again, the 70's sideburn thing is back IN again [maybe even to the extent of the 'Chops!] So Ed was COOL all along, u little bastinados! So there! Take that! So Car will take the 'Chops [Ed always did have some chops]...
Or maybe the dude w the 70's fro? Or the guy w the matted, havn't washed my head in wks dreadlocks look?
[Sorry...this post really wasn't "a hopefully thought-provoking" one... [img]redface.gif[/img]
I'll take the gal w the mullet, please.
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ December 18, 2003 02:24 PM: Message edited by: FuseU1 ]</font>
-
December 18th, 2003, 06:44 PM
#14
Inactive Member
That was thought provoking! You can have the gal with the mullet and I'll take the girl the tat on her . . . [img]wink.gif[/img]
-
December 19th, 2003, 02:38 AM
#15
Inactive Member
...Now, that "gal w the mullet" thing, 5; i KNOW you know that was me being absphhholutely ssphhhhilly, Sylvester [img]tongue.gif[/img] ...just making sure tho, ya know; jes clearin' da air, ssphho to ssphheak [img]wink.gif[/img] ...um, just where exactly would that girl's 'too be? Never mind, for da lub of everathang Elvis, DON'T answer that.... [img]graemlins/sure.gif[/img] [img]cool.gif[/img]
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ December 18, 2003 10:40 PM: Message edited by: FuseU1 ]</font>
-
December 19th, 2003, 04:12 PM
#16
Inactive Member
Don't answer that! I promise to be anatomically correct. I mean politically correct. [img]rolleyes.gif[/img]
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ December 19, 2003 12:20 AM: Message edited by: Five Eight ]</font>
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks